Complacency with Success Can Doom Your Company

This tale illustrates how complacency with success can lead to the downfall of even the largest companies. In 1949, during a downturn in the US stock market, the ten companies listed below offered dividends as high as 10%, with stocks priced below their working capital (not even counting their significant physical assets). Stockbrokers were puzzled by the lack of interest in these investments. Among the largest at the time, these ten companies are now defunct. It might be easy to assume that insider knowledge about their futures deterred investors, but that wasn’t the case. Each of these companies continued to operate at least until the mid-1950s.

If you let complacency with success rule your leadership team you are destined to be doomed.  Top companies from 1949 that no longer exist today.
Undervalued stocks from early-1949

Ultimately, these companies were doomed by their complacency with success, stemming from their dominant market position and size.

They were industry leaders yet failed to adapt to changing times. Take Lima-Hamilton, for example, which produced steam locomotives. As diesel engines gained popularity, Lima stubbornly clung to steam technology until their downfall. Similarly, Pullman, dominating the luxury sleeper car market for trains, did not foresee the decline in business due to rising automobile and airplane travel, leading to their demise.

Like Pullman, if you do not stay up on industry trends and adjust your business strategy you will fail.
Pullman Car Advertisement from 1949

The stock chart from that period is fascinating. Brokers were puzzled over why these seemingly undervalued stocks weren’t selling. The market was, in fact, grappling with the recession of 1949, which lasted 11 months—from November 1948 to October 1949. The real question is: why didn’t the executives of these leading companies anticipate the changes and adjust their market strategies to ensure their survival? The answer lies in a mindset of complacency and resistance to change.

The downfall of these companies serves as a cautionary tale for businesses today.

In today’s rapidly evolving market, it is crucial for companies to not only adapt but also stay ahead of the curve. The rise and fall of once-prominent companies such as Blockbuster, Kodak, and Sears have proven that no company is too big or successful to fail if they do not innovate and evolve with the times.

Moreover, this historical event highlights the importance of continuous learning and staying informed about market trends. Complacency with success can doom a company. It is essential for business leaders to constantly reassess their strategies and be open to new ideas, technologies, and consumer preferences. As the saying goes, “change is the only constant,” and those who resist it will eventually be left behind.

Here are some tips for businesses to avoid the fate of these defunct companies:

  • Conduct regular market research and stay up to date on industry trends

  • Invest in innovation and constantly look for ways to improve products or services

  • Encourage employee creativity and foster a culture of continuous improvement

  • Diversify revenue streams to reduce reliance on a single product or service

  • Embrace technology and integrate it into business operations

  • Be open to feedback from customers, employees, and industry experts to identify areas for improvement.

By implementing these strategies, businesses can not only survive but also thrive in an ever-changing market. Let us learn from the mistakes of the past and use them as steppingstones towards a more successful future.

In conclusion, the downfall of these ten once-successful companies serves as a reminder that no business can afford to become stagnant. Complacency with success must not cause a company to avoid innovating. Companies must always be willing to evolve and adapt in order to stay relevant and competitive in an ever-changing market. Those who fail to do so risk being overtaken by their more innovative and forward-thinking competitors.

Here is what the ten companies on the list made and when they went out of business:

  • Bigelow-Stanford – manufacturing and selling electric refrigerators. They went out of business in 1955.

  • E. W. Bliss – manufacturing and selling machine tools, presses, and dies. They went out of business in 1953.

  • Cincinnati Milling – also known as “The Mill,” manufacturing and selling milling machines. They went out of business in 1953.

  • Douglas Aircraft – manufacturing and selling aircraft. They were acquired by McDonnell Aircraft Corporation in 1967 and became a division of McDonnell Douglas until their final demise in 2006.

  • Foster Wheeler – engineering and construction, as well as manufacturing boilers and turbines. They were acquired by Amec Foster Wheeler in 2014 and later renamed to Wood plc in 2017.

  • Lee Rubber & Tire – manufacturing and selling rubber products. They went out of business in 1969.

  • Lima-Hamilton – manufacturing and selling steam locomotives. They were acquired by Baldwin Locomotive Works in 1947 and phased out operations by the early 1950s.

  • Montgomery-Ward – retail, selling a wide range of products. They went out of business in 2001.

  • N. Y. Shipbuilding – building ships for the US Navy and commercial clients. They went out of business in 1967.

  • Pullman – luxury sleeper cars for trains. They went out of business in 1969 after facing financial struggles due to the decline in train travel.

Click here for a post on how to not let success ruin your career.

You may also like:

The Importance of Understanding the Economic Baseline

After my article, “The Danger of leaders Not Listening“, I was asked why I thought many see the economy as struggling, despite signs of growth. I believe this sentiment stems largely from the significant changes brought about by COVID-19. When comparing pre-COVID prices to current ones, they are indisputably higher, reflecting an increased cost of living. The economic baseline from before COVID no longer applies.

Historical events like the post-WWII growth period show how economic baselines need reassessment after major disruptions.

The impact on cost of living during the two world wars. Need to understand the economic baseline.
The Impact on Cost of Living During the Two World Wars

Unfortunately, no one has clearly explained to the average American how COVID-19 affected the cost of living (and GDP). People blame the government for not controlling costs, but it’s challenging amid such upheavals. After events like COVID-19, a major realignment occurs, and the economy begins to grow again from this new baseline.

One major factor in the economy’s struggle is the shift to a more digital and remote lifestyle.

This transition was accelerated by COVID-19, forcing many businesses and industries to adapt quickly in order to survive. This resulted in job loss for some and increased competition for others, leading to financial instability and uncertainty.

Additionally, the pandemic highlighted existing inequalities within our society, particularly in terms of access to resources and opportunities. COVID-19’s economic impact hit marginalized communities harder, making recovery from the pandemic’s disruptions even more difficult.

Furthermore, there were concerns about inflation as a result of the massive amounts of government stimulus put into place during the pandemic. This led to fears of rising prices and a decrease in purchasing power for individuals and businesses.

To understand the economic struggles, we must also consider COVID-19’s psychological impact on consumer behavior.

Many people were more cautious with their spending, prioritizing essential items over non-essential purchases. This change in consumer behavior greatly affected businesses and their ability to thrive in that economic climate.

Overall, it is clear that COVID-19 had a significant impact on the economy and its recovery. Leaders must acknowledge the challenges and find sustainable solutions for both current struggles and long-term impacts. As we continue to navigate the pandemic’s impact, individuals should educate themselves on economic changes and adapt. Only then can we work towards a more stable and resilient economic future.

The effects of COVID-19 will be felt for years, so leaders should listen to concerns and address them proactively.

This includes supporting those most affected by the pandemic and implementing policies that promote economic growth and stability.

WWII as a Disruptive Event

The last major event to impact the economy like COVID (rapid GDP swings), with widespread business shutdowns and supply limitations, was World War II. Before WWII, the cost of living was lower due to economic stability and fewer disruptions. However, the war introduced significant shifts in production, supply and demand, and heightened government intervention, all of which influenced prices. After the war ended and production returned to normal, prices remained higher than before, resulting in a new economic baseline.

Like COVID-19, the aftermath of WWII required reassessing economic baselines for growth and stability. This teaches us to focus not only on short-term recovery but also on long-term solutions for a sustainable economy. Leaders then had to listen to individuals’ concerns, and it’s crucial for leaders today to do the same to guide us through uncertainty.

What Is Gross Domestic Product (GDP)?

Gross domestic product (GDP) represents the total monetary value or market worth of all finished goods and services produced within a country during a specific time period. Serving as a broad indicator of a nation’s overall economic output, GDP acts as a comprehensive measure of the country’s economic health.

Before World War II, the U.S. GDP was stable, but it surged as the country ramped up production for a wartime economy, retooling factories and hiring workers. After the war, GDP experienced a significant decline as factories adapted to a peacetime economy, leading to reduced production and substantial layoffs.

GDP fluctuation during and after WW2. The economic baseline changed.
GDP Fluctuation During and After WW2

Before COVID, the U.S. GDP was stable following the recovery from the 2008 financial crisis. However, when the pandemic struck, GDP plummeted as production halted and businesses closed. As the pandemic receded, GDP soared with the resumption of business activities, restaurant openings, and more. This resurgence caused a notable increase in GDP, leading to a higher cost of living and rising prices.

The chart illustrates that from 2020 to 2024, there were fluctuations reflecting the adverse cost of living impacts faced by the average American.

GDP fluctuation during and after COVID. The economic baseline changed.
GDP Fluctuation from 2020 to 2024

Volatile GDP fluctuations challenge wage growth, making it hard to keep pace. Despite GDP surpassing pre-COVID levels, wage and price stabilization is only now emerging. As the economy continues to recover, workers continue to grapple with stagnant wages and increasing living costs.

In conclusion, both COVID-19 and World War II serve as prominent examples of major events that have significantly disrupted the economy. These disruptions not only create short-term challenges but also require a reassessment and adaptation to new economic baselines in order for long-term stability and growth to occur. Understanding the impacts of these events on GDP is crucial in navigating through these changes and creating sustainable solutions for the future. So, it is essential to constantly monitor GDP and make necessary adjustments in response to major disruptions, ensuring a stronger and more resilient economy for all.

Click here for a post on the pandemics influence on technology.

Clarence Darrow and the Importance of Presentation

Clarence Darrow is celebrated as one of history’s most accomplished lawyers, largely due to his distinctive courtroom style. More than an eloquent speaker, his flair for dramatic performances was pivotal to his success. His ability to captivate juries with a commanding presence significantly boosted his extraordinary achievements. Learning from Darrow, the way you present yourself in business can enhance your chances of success.

Judge overlooking Clarence Darrow’s theatrics in court – 1924

Darrow’s courtroom style was renowned for its passion and persuasiveness.

He believed in the power of storytelling and often used anecdotes to connect with juries and evoke empathy. This approach not only made him a master advocate but also revolutionized legal presentations.

“The world is made up for the most part of morons and natural tyrants, sure of themselves, strong in their own opinions, never doubting anything.” – Clarence Darrow

Beyond the courtroom, Darrow’s legacy continues to inspire professionals from all walks of life. His powerful public speaking skills serve as a valuable lesson for business leaders who want to make a strong impression on their audience. By using storytelling, personal anecdotes, and captivating delivery, one can effectively convey a message and influence others. Darrow’s fearless approach to tackling challenging cases also teaches us the importance of taking risks and standing up for what we believe in, even if it goes against societal norms.

In business, telling a compelling story can be crucial in securing deals, partnerships, or funding.

People are more likely to remember and be swayed by a well-crafted narrative than by dry facts and figures. Additionally, a strong, commanding presence can leave a lasting impression on potential clients or investors.

Beyond his theatrical performances, Darrow was recognized for his unwavering dedication to defending the underdog and fighting for justice. He took on unpopular cases and challenged societal norms, often facing backlash. Yet, his resolve to fight for his beliefs earned him respect from both colleagues and opponents.

In the business world, standing up for your values and beliefs, even when they diverge from popular opinion, is vital. By staying true to your principles, you can earn respect from peers and establish yourself as trustworthy.

Clarence Darrow’s legacy teaches us that powerful storytelling, a strong presence, and dedication can lead to success in both the courtroom and boardroom. When presenting or pitching an idea, channel your inner Clarence Darrow and captivate your audience with your unique style. As Darrow himself said, “The only real lawyers are trial lawyers.” In business, effective communication and persuasion can make all the difference in achieving your goals.

In conclusion, Clarence Darrow’s influence extends far beyond the realm of law. His mastery of storytelling, commanding presence, and steadfast beliefs are valuable lessons for anyone looking to excel in their field. By embracing these qualities and incorporating them into your own style, you too can achieve extraordinary success in both personal and professional endeavors. So instead of viewing Darrow as solely a “lawyer,” let us remember him as a trailblazer and inspiration for all professionals striving for excellence.

But was Clarence Darrow considered a good person?

It is debatable whether Clarence Darrow was considered a good person. While he undoubtedly had a great legal mind and made significant contributions to the field of law, his personal life and actions have been highly controversial. He often defended clients accused of heinous crimes, including murder, which some viewed as morally questionable. Additionally, Darrow was known for taking on cases purely for publicity or financial gain rather than solely for justice. However, others argue that his dedication to defending the underprivileged and fighting against social injustices outweigh any negative aspects. Ultimately, it is up to individual interpretation whether Darrow can be considered a “good” person or not. So, while he may have been a master in the courtroom, his character remains a topic of debate.

Nevertheless, Darrow’s impact on the legal profession cannot be denied. His defense of controversial clients and his use of innovative tactics set a precedent for future lawyers to challenge traditional methods and push boundaries. In addition, Darrow’s belief in rehabilitation instead of harsh punishment greatly influenced criminal justice reform movements. He was also an advocate for civil rights and fought against discrimination based on race and religion.

Click here for a post on building presentation and communication skills.

How Lack of Diversity at the Top Impacts All

I recently encountered a January 1949 article about Harry Truman and the 81st Congress, featuring a photograph of the newly elected Democratic Senators. At that time, Democrats had just regained control of both the House and the Senate. The image was captivating, showing Lyndon Johnson and Hubert Humphrey at the start of their Senate careers—future president and vice president. More striking, though, was the evident lack of diversity, highlighting limited representation in Congress and the Senate during the 1940s. This absence reflected the policies, rights, and societal makeup of the nation then, a time when racial and gender discrimination were the norm, dominated by white men.

The 1949 newly elected Senators including Lyndon Johnson and Herbert Humphrey

Since then, we have made significant strides in promoting diversity and inclusion in politics.

The United States elected its first African American president, Barack Obama, and Kamala Harris became the first female Asian American Vice President. Additionally, there is a record number of women and people of color now serving in Congress. This progress highlights the hard work and dedication of activists, leaders, and citizens who have fought for equal representation and rights.

However, despite this progress, much work remains.

The lack of diversity in politics is an ongoing issue that requires attention. Though representation from marginalized communities has increased, major barriers still hinder full participation in the political process. These include systemic racism, voter suppression, and unequal access to resources.

To continue advancing towards a more diverse and inclusive government, it is essential to recognize and address these issues. We must ensure equal opportunities for all to run for office and be heard, regardless of race, gender, or socio-economic status. This involves investing in community outreach, increasing local government representation, and promoting diversity in political parties.

Moreover, diversity in politics goes beyond mere representation.

It involves creating an inclusive environment where diverse perspectives are valued, by promoting open dialogue and listening to marginalized communities. This helps develop policies that better reflect the diverse population they serve.

Consider how lack of diversity translates into the business world.

If the leadership of your organization were homogenous, with similar ideas, the company would mirror that lack of diversity. This lack of diversity can lead to blind spots, limiting the company’s potential for growth and success. In contrast, a diverse team brings varied perspectives and experiences to the table, leading to more innovation and creativity.

In conclusion, despite progress in promoting diversity and inclusion in politics, much work remains. We must keep striving for equal representation and ensure all voices are heard in government. By doing so, we can create a more just society and pave the way for future generations of diverse leaders. This mindset should also extend beyond politics into all areas of society, as embracing diversity builds stronger communities and a better world for all. Let us continue moving forward on this journey towards equality and inclusivity.

Click here for a post on how to handle inheriting an organization that’s not diverse.

You may also like:

The Charismatic Leader: Look Beyond the Surface

A charismatic leader emerged, resonating with those who felt disenfranchised by political and economic systems or believed the government was unsupportive. Initially small, his following grew quickly as he toured the nation, captivating audiences with fiery speeches and promises of change. He frequently exaggerated or distorted facts about the nation’s condition, painting a dire picture of a country in crisis. His claims suggested that government leaders were more focused on opposing and controlling the populace than helping them, a narrative that, despite inaccuracies, gained traction among those feeling neglected by traditional politics.

This rhetoric fueled a political movement, leading to street protests, marches, and an attempted violent overthrow of the government.

The uprising was swiftly and harshly suppressed, with its organizers and many protesters rounded up and imprisoned. However, the leader, thanks to his influential connections among sympathetic judges and politicians, managed to evade severe repercussions. He cleverly used his legal battles and convictions for inciting violence to portray himself as a martyr, claiming the government unjustly targeted him and warning followers they might be next. This narrative was consistently spread at rallies, in pamphlets, and on the radio, resonating across the nation. With each event, his audience grew, drawn by the view of him as a savior who could deliver them from troubles and restore the country’s former glory.

The leader exploited the situation at the overwhelmed borders, where migrants sought refuge, to stoke fear and resentment.

He targeted these impoverished individuals as scapegoats for the country’s problems, further polarizing the public. He also blamed other politicians for the nation’s economic and social woes, making them targets for his fiercely loyal followers.

Over time, this leader’s political movement grew to be one of the largest and most loyal in the country.

Riding a wave of support, this charismatic leader was elected and quickly dismantled the constitution, reshaping the government to prevent challenges to his authority. He became a dictator with total control, silencing dissent and ensuring no one could question his actions. Critics of the leader were systematically persecuted, yet his followers remained steadfastly loyal, driven by his charisma and promises.

Aspiring to make the country the world’s strongest, he allied with global leaders sharing his authoritarian vision. However, unchecked control led to corruption, and he overstepped with reckless policies, spiraling the country into destruction. The nation, once proud, lay in ruins, devastated by war and strife, needing a rebuild with a democratic framework for future stability and hope.

The leader in question is Adolf Hitler, and the nation he led to ruin is Germany.

In conclusion, we must remember the past and remain vigilant against the potential consequences of dire circumstances. Charismatic leaders possess both positive and negative traits, warranting close scrutiny. Our nation has encountered numerous challenges, yet its resilience continually shines through. United by a shared history and common values, our diverse and determined people will choose the right path forward. With collective strength and unwavering resolve, we can overcome any adversity we face.

Click here for a post on Lincoln’s battle for emancipation – the Demon of Unrest.

error: Content is protected !!